I throw out random thoughts about the status of the world as I spend my days thinking too much. This is my experiment....we can be friends or enemies. Both are fine with me. Conflict is just as interesting as compromise. Let me know how I can make this blog better.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Wednesday, January 11, 2012
Ron Paul or Benjamin Button?
How does Ron Paul do it? He's 127 years old but he seems to have the vitality of a 17 year old. He still looks 127 years old but he is out there on the campaign trail keeping right up with those 55 year old kids he is running against.
Coolest Kid Ever.....But He Will Be A Scary Adult
This kid is awesome. He got mad at his grandmother and his genius 7 year-old mind decided to steal her car. He gets on the news after a police chase and when he's interviewed he is very frank and has no remorse. I can't wait to see what this kid contributes to society.
P.S.- I just read online that the kid in the video was taken for a mental health evaluation a month after all of this happened because he allegedly beat up his grandmother (yeah, the one who's car he stole) in a Wal-Mart. I told you he'd contribute a lot to society. I just didn't expect it to start so soon after his first brush with the law.....wait, the kid is 7. How can he beat up a grown woman? This also leads to the question: how could anyone in a Wal-Mart let a 7 year-old beat up a woman and not do anything to help her?
Tebow: Disney World or Holy Land Experience?
If Tim Tebow wins the Super Bowl and the television guy asks him what he's gonna do now, will he say "I'm going to the Promised Land!"?
Or, will he say "I'm going to The Holy Land Experience in Orlando, FL!" (www.holylandexperience.com)?
"If You Ain't Cheatin', You Ain't Tryin'"
While this time its not actually cheating, we all know that the Patriots will do anything, legal or illegal, to gain an advantage. Google "Spygate" for the Patriots and Belichick's most recent foray into the world of major sports cheating scandals.
Tebow Pay Day
Tim Tebow got paid $250,000 for his win over Pittsburgh on Saturday night. How much goes into a new pinstriped suit and how much goes in the offering plate?
Sir Jonathan Ive: Continuing the Vision
Jonathan Ive, Apple's chief designer for almost 20 years, was knighted last week in recognition for his amazing contributions to Apple's vision
in designing its major products over the past two decades. He was the
leading design and conceptual mind behind the iMac, PowerBook G4, G4
Cube, MacBook, MacBook Pro, MacBook Air, iPod, iPhone, and iPad. His
estimated net worth (including Apple stock options) is close to $130
million. His current salary is $2 million/year.
It must be nice to have a title in front of your name. We don't have that option here in the states although an American citizen can be given the honorary title of "Sir" if he has contributed enough to the Commonwealth. Stephen Spielberg, Rudy Giuliani, Alan Greenspan, Ted Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, Wesley Clark, Dwight Eisenhower, Douglas MacArthur, George Marshall, Chester Nimitz, Omar Bradley, George Patton, Colin Powell, Bill Gates, Paul Getty, Billy Graham, Edward R. Murrow, and J. Edgar Hoover are notable Americans who have been designated as knights of the United Kingdom.
Having your chief designer knighted for his contributions to the consumer electronic industry really shows how important Apple has been, and will continue to be, to not only this industry, but to the whole world. Consumer electronics spill over into almost every industry these days.
Apple has been the one company who stays ahead of the competition by designing products that people do not know that they need yet. Apple is unique in this strategy because they are almost always correct. This causes companies to try to copy the products that Apple produces because they know that if Apple says a product is the next big thing, it usually is and most of the time it is because Apple says it is the next big thing that the product, and market for that product, is ultimately successful.
It must be nice to have a title in front of your name. We don't have that option here in the states although an American citizen can be given the honorary title of "Sir" if he has contributed enough to the Commonwealth. Stephen Spielberg, Rudy Giuliani, Alan Greenspan, Ted Kennedy, Ronald Reagan, Wesley Clark, Dwight Eisenhower, Douglas MacArthur, George Marshall, Chester Nimitz, Omar Bradley, George Patton, Colin Powell, Bill Gates, Paul Getty, Billy Graham, Edward R. Murrow, and J. Edgar Hoover are notable Americans who have been designated as knights of the United Kingdom.
Having your chief designer knighted for his contributions to the consumer electronic industry really shows how important Apple has been, and will continue to be, to not only this industry, but to the whole world. Consumer electronics spill over into almost every industry these days.
Apple has been the one company who stays ahead of the competition by designing products that people do not know that they need yet. Apple is unique in this strategy because they are almost always correct. This causes companies to try to copy the products that Apple produces because they know that if Apple says a product is the next big thing, it usually is and most of the time it is because Apple says it is the next big thing that the product, and market for that product, is ultimately successful.
Debt: A Love Story
$15.218 trillion
Each American owns over $48,000 of that debt (313 million legal citizens).
Our budget hasn't been truly balanced since 1957 when Eisenhower was president (people say Clinton had a surplus in 2000 [$230 billion] but he actually offset budget costs by borrowing from multiple non-budget items such as Social Security [$152.3 billion]).
Basically, we (and everyone born since 1957) have been paying for poor fiscal decisions made over the past 50 years. Some of the people who made those decisions are long deceased. Some are living in multi-million dollar homes while we are scraping by. The rest are still making those decisions in government now.
Politicians need to start making decisions based not on what their party has demanded and start making them based on what an actual American would believe.
They routinely make decisions based on what a person who will live off of a pension from the seemingly endless funds of the U.S. Treasury department would think and not based on what a person who has worked hard his whole life and does not have a sure source of income after he retires.
They think "I won't get reelected by my masters (party handlers) if I think and vote this way" instead of "this will be the best decision for the people who elected me in the first place".
Debt Up To Our Eyeballs
There are two parts of our national debt. Part 1 is "intragovernmental holdings" which is money the government has borrowed from federal trust funds (Medicare, Social Security, the Federal Financing Bank) to pay for current governmental operations. It has never gone over $5 trillion. The second part is debt held by the public. This number has gone up from $3,789,667,546,849.60 in September of 1997 to $10,481,500,229,395.09....yesterday. The debt held by the public is all federal debt held by individuals, corporations, state or local governments, foreign governments, and other entities outside the United States Government....including Treasury Bonds.
Drug Testing the Poor
The Dumbing of America
Pro-Life Baby, Adolescent, Adult, and Elderly Killers
The pro-life candidates don't seem to mind invading countries, bombing, and killing countless fully grown humans....when there's money to be made.
Abortions cost $ so fiscal conservatives are against them (among other reasons supposedly).
Killing people to extend our sphere of influence is ultimately profitable for our economy so it's obvious what conservatives think about that.
There is also no profit to be made in keeping a homeless or elderly person alive so they don't mind letting them die.
I guess unborn fetuses are potential future votes for the Republican candidate.Politics make me sick.
Abortions cost $ so fiscal conservatives are against them (among other reasons supposedly).
Killing people to extend our sphere of influence is ultimately profitable for our economy so it's obvious what conservatives think about that.
There is also no profit to be made in keeping a homeless or elderly person alive so they don't mind letting them die.
I guess unborn fetuses are potential future votes for the Republican candidate.Politics make me sick.
Larry the Fraudulent Cable Guy
Larry the Cable Guy is a fraud. He makes his $$$ convincing his fans that he is a working class, "blue collar" guy from the south. He is really from Pawnee City, Nebraska and his southern accent is purely part of his act.
Not only has Daniel Lawrence Whitney not ever been a cable guy, but it's not even clear that he has ever had a blue collar job. He started his career doing radio jobs and voice overs.So all of these southerners who idolize Larry the Cable Guy are really supporting Daniel Whitney, radio personality and southern "good old boy" impostor, from Pawnee City, Nebraska.....about as far north as you can get without being in a Dakota.Execute a Corporation?
If corporations are people, can they be executed for being convicted of crimes? Many major corporations would face execution if so. Enron, Exxon, and BP would be prime candidates for execution. Between the three, billions of dollars have been stolen from stockholders, the lobbying industry has been bloated by the thirst for exponential profit which extends these problems further, corruption of gov't officials to change energy prices has been perpetuated, the lives of countless fisherman and seamen of some sort have been irreparably altered, the impact on the various ecosystems affected by oil spills is vast and will not be known for decades, hundreds of employees and contractors have been killed by accidents that could have been prevented if the almighty dollar wasn't the only thing on the plant or oil platform's safety inspector's mind, the economies and individual markets of not only the immediately affected states but countless interconnected economies and markets of other states have been all but destroyed. If you ask me (and I realize that you haven't), I think that a man who killed three people in cold blood over a crack deal gone wrong is way less dangerous than a global corporation who routinely cuts corners that result in preventable deaths, has participated in destroying millions of acres of invaluable ecosystems while contributing to our environmental problems more than any other single corporation, and pays off entire governments to allow them to keep acting this way as long as money keeps rolling in. Yes, the murderer should be taken out of society but the entity responsible for the much more egregious crimes against humanity should not be given a pass simply because they have more money than everyone else. It seems that the more money you have, the more atrocious crimes you can commit.
Politics These Days
Sadly, the more money you have, the more atrocious crimes you can commit. If you're a multi-billion dollar corporation, you can get away with actions that negatively affect large portions of our population or environment (destroying wetlands, rampantly polluting just because it's allowed under current EPA regulations, relaxing safety guidelines that lead to oil spills, corrupting officials, fraud, outsourcing, and over-litigating to avoid wrongful death lawsuits filed for grossly inadequate safety precautions because they can push a man with medical bills and no income out of a lawsuit just by filing papers in court for 5 years) simply because you have the money to hire lobbyists to pay congressmen to make what you're doing legal. Money talks. They teach you that if you always do what's right then you'll get ahead in this world. What they don't tell you is how naïve that worldview is.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)